Annalee Newitz at io9.com reviews an essay by Heather Phillips entitled "
The Great Library at Alexandria?". She makes two points about an institution often cited in discussions of digital preservation that have particular resonance at a time when the US government is mostly shut down, and may be forced into default.
First, contrary to popular myth, it appears the library was not destroyed overnight by fire, but decayed slowly over a long period of time as its initially lavish budget was repeatedly cut.
Phillips writes:
Though it seems fitting that the destruction of so mythic an institution
as the Great Library of Alexandria must have required some cataclysmic
event . . . in reality, the fortunes of the Great Library waxed and
waned with those of Alexandria itself. Much of its downfall was gradual,
often bureaucratic, and by comparison to our cultural imaginings,
somewhat petty.
As I've
frequently said, the biggest threat to the long-term survival of digital materials is economic. This isn't something new.
Second, the importance of the library was not its collection, but the synergy between its collection and the scholars it attracted.
Newitz writes:
What made the Museum and its daughter branch great were its scholars.
And when the Emperor abolished their stipends, and forbade foreign
scholars from coming to the library, he effectively shut down
operations. Those scrolls and books were nothing without people to care
for them, study them, and share what they learned far and wide.
What matters isn't the perfection of a collection, but the usefulness of a collection.
Digital preservation purists may scorn the Internet Archive, but as I write this post Alexa ranks
archive.org the
167th most used site on the Internet. For comparison, the
Library of Congress is currently
the 4,212st ranked site (and is up despite the shutdown), the
Bibliothèque Nationale de France is ranked 16,274 and the
British Library is
ranked 29.498. Little-used collections, such as dark archives, post-cancellation only archives, and access-restricted copyright deposit collections are all at much greater economic risk in the long term than widely used sites such as the Internet Archive.
Of course, many of the important (and thus well-used) works from the Library of Alexandria survived because their importance meant that there were
lots of copies.
Newitz writes:
Even this account of the burning has to be taken with a grain of salt.
The first stories of it appear hundreds of years after the events that
took place, and historians aren't sure whether it's accurate. Canfora also notes that by the time this alleged destruction took place, the men
who cared for the library were aware that many of its important works
were in circulation elsewhere in the world. Major centers of learning
had been established in India and Central Asia, along the great Silk
Road, where nomadic scholars wandered between temples that were stocked
with books.
