Tuesday, August 27, 2024

2024 Optical Media Durability Update

Six years ago I posted Optical Media Durability and discovered:
Surprisingly, I'm getting good data from CD-Rs more than 14 years old, and from DVD-Rs nearly 12 years old. Your mileage may vary.
Here are the subsequent annual updates:
It is time once again for the mind-numbing process of feeding 45 disks through the readers to verify their checksums, and yet again this year every single MD5 was successfully verified. Below the fold, the details.


MonthMediaGoodBadVendor
01/04CD-R5x0GQ
05/04CD-R5x0Memorex
02/06CD-R5x0GQ
11/06DVD-R5x0GQ
12/06DVD-R1x0GQ
01/07DVD-R4x0GQ
04/07DVD-R3x0GQ
05/07DVD-R2x0GQ
07/11DVD-R4x0Verbatim
08/11DVD-R1x0Verbatim
05/12DVD+R2x0Verbatim
06/12DVD+R3x0Verbatim
04/13DVD+R2x0Optimum
05/13DVD+R3x0Optimum
The fields in the table are as follows:
  • Month: The date marked on the media in Sharpie, and verified via the on-disk metadata.
  • Media: The type of media.
  • Good: The number of media with this type and date for which all MD5 checksums were correctly verified.
  • Bad: The number of media with this type and date for which any file failed MD5 verification.
  • Vendor: the vendor name on the media
The drives I use from ASUS and LG report significant numbers of read errors from the CDs but verify the MD5s correctly. I didn't notice them reporting any read errors from the DVDs. An off-brand drive fails to read the CDs, but read one of the older DVDs with no read errors.

Surprisingly, with no special storage precautions, generic low-cost media, and consumer drives, I'm getting good data from CD-Rs more than 20 years old, and from DVD-Rs nearly 18 years old. Your mileage may vary. Tune in again next year for another episode.

I also checked my Memorex NetBSD1.2 CD written in October 1996. It has checksums generated by cksum(1), all of which verified correctly despite a number of read errors. So that CD-R is delivering good data after nearly 28 years.

No comments:

Post a Comment