tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post3931525100657198073..comments2024-03-16T18:42:21.178-07:00Comments on DSHR's Blog: Patio Perspectives at ANADP II: Preserving the Other HalfDavid.http://www.blogger.com/profile/14498131502038331594noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post-41291397079145855612013-12-09T13:30:22.629-08:002013-12-09T13:30:22.629-08:00At CNI. Martin Klein reported initial results from...At CNI. Martin Klein reported initial results from <a href="http://hiberlink.org/" rel="nofollow">Hiberlink</a>, a new research project into reference rot of web-at-large resources (i.e. not references to other scholarly articles). This includes both link rot and content change.<br /><br />In their PubMed sample, about 40% of the web-at-large references were archived, supporting the numbers I quoted above.<br /><br />This research is extremely interesting.David.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14498131502038331594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post-42695071068229129612013-11-25T07:19:05.846-08:002013-11-25T07:19:05.846-08:00I've been mulling the question about 'whos...I've been mulling the question about 'whose responsibility?'. Is there a new set of answers for the digital? In days of print the author may have had an interest in longevity of what s/he wrote but hardly the responsibility. Similarly, the publisher complied with (legal) deposit but might not feel the responsibility. And now every library wants an e-connection without the burden of having to maintain an e-collection. Does the publisher now have the de facto archival responsibility - and does that need some de jure? But as ever, you shine a light in dark corners ...Peter Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11291890583827924990noreply@blogger.com